Ace Breaking News – In short: Countries have failed to reach an agreement on tackling plastic pollution after more than 200 delegates met in South Korea for what was meant to be a final round of talks.
What’s next?
They remained divided on the basic scope of a treaty, with most countries wanting to cap plastic production, while a handful were only prepared to target plastic waste.
For any proposal to make it into the treaty, every nation must agree to it. But with time running out on Monday, delegates could only agree to resume talks at a later date.
Countries negotiating a global treaty to curb plastic pollution have failed to reach an agreement, with more than 100 nations wanting to cap production, while a handful of oil producers were prepared only to target plastic waste.
For a week, more than 200 negotiators have wrestled with how to stop millions of tonnes of plastic waste entering the environment each year.
They had agreed two years ago that they would find a way to address the crisis by the end of 2024, with this fifth UN Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5) meeting in Busan, South Korea, meant to be the final one by yielding a legally binding global treaty.
However, on Monday, countries remained far apart on the basic scope of a treaty and could agree only to postpone key decisions and resume talks, dubbed INC-5.2, at a later date.
“It is clear that there is still persisting divergence,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme.
The most divisive issues included capping plastic production, managing plastic products and chemicals of concern, and financing to help developing countries implement the treaty.
An option proposed by Panama — backed by more than 100 countries — would have created a path for a global plastic production reduction target, while another proposal did not include production caps.
The fault lines were apparent in a revised document released on Sunday by the meeting’s chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso, which may form the basis of a treaty, but remained riddled with options on the most sensitive issues.
“A treaty that … only relies on voluntary measures would not be acceptable,” said Juliet Kabera, director general of Rwanda’s Environment Management Authority.
“It is time we take it seriously and negotiate a treaty that is fit for purpose and not built to fail.”
The most divisive issues at the UN plastic talks were capping plastic production and financing to help developing countries implement the treaty. (AP Photo: Ahn Young-joon)normal
A small number of petrochemical-producing nations, such as Saudi Arabia, have strongly opposed efforts to reduce plastic production and have tried to use procedural tactics to delay negotiations.
“There was never any consensus,” said Saudi Arabian delegate Abdulrahman Al Gwaiz.
“There are a couple of articles that somehow seem to make it [into the document] despite our continued insistence that they are not within the scope.
“If you address plastic pollution, there should be no problem with producing plastics, because the problem is the pollution, not the plastics themselves.”
China, the United States, India, South Korea and Saudi Arabia were the top five primary polymer-producing nations in 2023, according to data provider Eunomia.
Entrenched divisions
If negotiators had overcome such divisions, the treaty would have been one of the most significant deals relating to environmental protection since the 2015 Paris Agreement.
The postponement comes just days after the turbulent conclusion of the COP29 summit in Baku, Azerbaijan.
At Baku, countries set a new global target for mobilising $US300 billion ($460 billion) annually in climate finance — a deal deemed woefully insufficient by small island states and many developing countries.
The climate talks were also slowed by procedural manoeuvres by Saudi Arabia who objected to the inclusion of language that reaffirmed a previous commitment to transition away from fossil fuels.
Some negotiators said a few countries held the proceedings hostage, avoiding compromises needed by using the UN’s consensus process.
Senegal’s National Delegate, Cheikh Ndiaye Sylla, called it “a big mistake” to exclude voting during the entire negotiations, an agreement made last year during the second round of talks in Paris.
“This outcome underscores the complexity of addressing plastic pollution on a global scale and the need for further deliberations to achieve an effective, inclusive and workable treaty,” said Chris Jahn, council secretary of the International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA), representing plastic makers.
Environmental group GAIA said: “There is little assurance that the next INC will succeed where INC-5 did not.”
Plastic production is on track to triple by 2050, and microplastics have been found in the air, fresh produce and even human breast milk.
Chemicals found to be of concern in plastics include more than 3,200, according to a 2023 UN Environment Programme report, which said women and children were particularly susceptible to their toxicity.
Despite the postponement, several negotiators expressed urgency to get back into talks.
“Every day of delay is a day against humanity. Postponing negotiations does not postpone the crisis,” said Panama’s delegation head Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomez on Sunday.
“When we reconvene, the stakes will be higher.”
At Sterling Publishing & Media Service Agency, we value transparency and accountability. We want to inform you that we are not responsible for any external content, links, or posts. Nonetheless, we are dedicated to providing exceptional services and sincerely appreciate your support. Thank you.
@acenewsservices
You must be logged in to post a comment.