
The Difference between Jesus Christ’s Concept of Salvation and Paul of Tarsus’s Concept of the Salvation:
Paul misled the way to salvation by excluding one of the essential elements, that is, observance of the Law of Commandments. He advised only the lip service, escaping from the reponsibility to keep the commandments. He wronged the concept of righteousness and faith and misrepresented the judgement of God. To become righteous, and to achieve salvation, faith alone, is not sufficient. Obedience to God’s commands is a must, but according to Paul, he has a different and weird concept :
a-” For we come to the conclusion that a man is justified by faith without the works of the Law.” (Romans 3:28)
b-” It is the message of faith, which we preach, that if you confess with your lips the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart, one believes so that he is made righteous and with the mouth confession is made for salvation.”
(Romans 10:9)
Although Jesus {P.B.u.h.} taught his followers that anyone who attains salvation must have faith in God and, at the same time, must obey the revelations of God. It is contrary to every human intellect that the salvation can be obtained by faith, leaving aside the practical obedience to God.
However, we read in (Matthew 5:19)
“Whoever, therefore, abolishes the least significant of these commands and so teaches the people , he shall be of least significance in the Kingdom of heaven; but whoever shall observe and teach them shall be prominent in the Kingdom of heaven.”
And in (Matthew19:17)
“If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.”
And of course, this will lead us to Therefore Concept of the original Sin
Paul’s Doctrine of ” The Original Sin”
The unreasonable concept of “the Original Sin” was initiated by Paul, according to whom, a man is a sinner, only because his father or forefathers have sinned:
“Sin came into the world through one man.”



You must be logged in to post a comment.